digital equipment photography professional The merits of digital versus film photography were considered by photographers and filmmakers in the early 21st century after consumer became widely available. and have both advantages and disadvantages relative to and photography. In the 21st century photography came to be predominantly digital, but traditional methods continue to serve many users and applications.
The visual quality of a digital photograph can be evaluated in several ways. The of an image is related to its and is often used as a. The quantity of picture elements () in the is usually counted in millions and called "". Sensor pixel density sets a limit on the final output resolution of images captured with that sensor. Other factors, such as the effect of a or other filter on the digital sensor and the image processing algorithm used to interpolate raw sensor data to image pixels. Most digital sensors are arranged in a rectangular grid pattern, making certain images (for example of parallel lines) susceptible to artifacts. Film is not affected by moire because of the random orientation of the silver salts in its emulsion, however the pattern of these silver salts may become visible upon enlargement, creating the patterns called "grain" in the final output.
The resolution of film images depends upon the area of film used to record the image (, or ) and the. Estimates of a photograph's resolution taken with a camera vary. More information may be recorded if a is used, while the use of poor-quality optics or coarse-grained film may yield lower image resolution. A 36 mm × 24 mm frame of ISO 100- was initially estimated to contain the equivalent of 20 million pixels, or approximately 23,000 pixels per square mm.
Many professional-quality film cameras use or films. Because of the relatively large size of the imaging area these media provide, they can record higher resolution images than most consumer digital cameras. Based upon the above pixel density, a medium-format film image can record an equivalent resolution of approximately 83 million pixels in the case of a 60 x 60 mm frame, to 125 million pixels in the case of a 60 x 90 mm frame. In the case of large format, 4 x 5 inch films can record approximately 298.7 million pixels, and 1,200 million pixels in the case of 8 x 10 inch film. However, as with a digital system, poor optical quality of lenses will decrease the resolving potential of a film emulsion.
Noise and grain
, produced by spontaneous fluctuations in detected photocurrents, degrades darker areas of electronic images with random variations of pixel color and brightness. becomes obvious in areas of even and delicate tone. Grain and are linked, with more sensitive films having more obvious grain. Likewise, with digital cameras, images taken at higher sensitivity settings show more than those taken at lower sensitivities.
However, even if both techniques have inherent noise, it is widely appreciated that for color, digital photography has much less noise/grain than film at equivalent sensitivity, leading to an edge in image quality. For black-and-white photography, grain takes a more positive role in image quality, and such comparisons are less valid.
Noise in digital cameras can produce color distortion or confetti-like patterns, in indoor lighting typically occurring most severely on the blue component and least severely on the red component. Nearly all digital cameras apply to to counteract noise due to pixel leakage. For very long exposures, the must be operated at low temperatures to prevent noise affecting the final image. Film grain is not affected by exposure time, although the marginal sensitivity of the film changes with lengthy exposures, a phenomenon known as.
Autofocus and auto exposure systems
Traditional exposure metering and autofocus systems employ secondary sensors, whose readings are typically low-fidelity (e.g. a very small number of averaged readings from various image areas vs. fully resolved image information) and may not correspond to the actually recorded image, for example due to issues, differing sensitivity towards, differing spectral response, differing amplitude response, of optical elements in the sensing system, differing sensitivity towards stray light, or misalignment of the of the sensor. Most digital cameras allow to capture and analyze image information from the same sensor as used for image recording in real-time. Using this information for exposure and focus determination inherently eliminates most alignment and calibration issues, while simultaneously eliminating the cost of secondary metering sensors.
Film typically assumes using separate films to account for white balance of scene (typically in two variants: for sunlight or tungsten lamps), or usage of filters. Many film cameras had a dial to help user keep track of type of film that was loaded in the camera.
is a significant factor in the quality of both the digital and emulsion images. Both film and digital sensors exhibit non-linear responses to the amount of light, and at the edges of the dynamic range, close to underexposure and overexposure the media will exhibit particularly non-linear responses. The non-linear dynamic response or saturation qualities of emulsion film are often considered a desirable effect by photographers, and the distortion of colour, contrast and brightness varies considerably between film stocks. There is no limit to the number of possible levels of colour on emulsion film, whereas a digital sensor stores integer numbers, producing a limited and specific possible number of colours. may be visible in the unusual case that it is not obscured by noise, and detail may be lost, particularly in shadow and highlight areas.
Digital sensors might also suffer from issue, though degree of it varies significantly between sensors.
Digital camera manufacturers have made consistent improvements in the dynamic range captured by their products. Some cameras have an automatic mode, to be used in conjunction with software. Output media also have characteristic limitations to the dynamic range they are able to reproduce and the linearity of display.
Convenience and flexibility
Flexibility and convenience are among the reasons for the widespread adoption of digital cameras. With film cameras, a roll is usually completely exposed before being processed. When the film is returned, it is possible to see the photograph, but most digital cameras incorporate a that allows the image to be viewed immediately after capture. The photographer may delete undesired or unnecessary photographs, or reshoot the image if required. A user who wants prints can quickly and easily print just the required photographs.
Photographic film is made with specific characteristics of and (ISO). Lighting conditions often require characteristics different from those of the film specifications, requiring the use of or corrections in. Digital photography allows colour temperature and sensitivity to be adjusted at each shot, either manually or automatically.
Digital images may be conveniently stored on a personal computer or in such as small. Professional-grade digital cameras can store pictures in a, which stores the output from the sensor, rather than processing it immediately to form an image. When edited in suitable software, such as or the GNU program (which uses to read raw files), the user may manipulate certain parameters, such as contrast, sharpness, or before producing an image. images can be similarly manipulated, though usually less precisely; software for this purpose may be provided with consumer-grade cameras. Digital photography allows the quick collection of a large quantity of archival documents, bringing convenience, lower cost, and increased flexibility in using the documents.
There are some areas where film may have some advantages. Modern film cameras are not as power-thirsty as modern digital cameras and can last longer on smaller batteries. Some film cameras, especially older ones, can operate without batteries: some will function completely without batteries, while others may lose some functionality such as metering and some shutter speeds. Batteries that only have to power light meters are often very small and can last a long time. This can be a boon for those who may be spending a long time with little or no access to electricity or a source of batteries.
Compared to film, digital cameras are capable of much higher (sensitivity to light) and can perform better in low light or very short exposures. The effective speed of a digital camera can be adjusted at any time, while the film must be changed in a film to change the speed.
Dust on the image plane is a constant issue for photographers, and especially so in digital photography. DSLR cameras are especially prone to dust problems because the sensor remains in place, whereas a film advances through the camera for each exposure. Debris in the camera, such as dust or sand, may scratch the film; a single grain of sand can damage a whole roll of film. As film cameras age, they can develop burs in their rollers. With a digital SLR, dust is difficult to avoid but is easy to rectify using a computer with image-editing software. Some digital SLRs have systems that remove dust from the sensor by vibrating or knocking it, sometimes in conjunction with software that remembers where dust is located and removes dust-affected pixels from images.
Compact digital cameras are fitted with fixed lenses, which makes it harder for dust to get into the image area. Similar film cameras are often only light-tight and not environmentally sealed. Some modern DSLRs, like the Olympus E-3, incorporate extensive dust and weather seals to avoid this problem.
Film and digital imaging systems have different cost emphases. Digital cameras are significantly more expensive to purchase than film equivalents. Prices are however dropping rapidly due to intense competition. Film cameras, on the other hand, are quite inexpensive to purchase, especially used equipment, but require ongoing film and development costs. However, in the digital realm, it could be argued that the constant state of technological change will cause a digital user to keep upgrading and buying other equipment once their digital camera becomes quickly obsolete. Other costs of digital photography include specialized batteries, memory cards and long-term data storage. The cost of digital editing software can be considerable, especially if newer features are required. The emergence of very high quality phone cameras since the early 2010s are making lower end, small sensor digital cameras redundant, almost as quickly as they grew in the last decade. Consequently, manufacturers are focusing attention to premium models such as compact system cameras and large sensor compacts. Mobile phones such as the iPhone X, Samsung Galaxy S8 and the Nokia Lumia 1020 are capable of images that can rival or beat cheaper dedicated cameras. can make low-quality prints cheaply and easily from digital files, but high-quality inkjet printing has costs comparable to wet photo process printing, regardless of initial image source.
There are specific arguments in the film vs. digital debate.
Most is displayed in, which is only a small amount more resolution than the consumer-oriented format.
High profile film directors such as, and have all publicly criticized digital cinema and, and advocated the use of film and film prints. Most famously, Tarantino suggested in 2012 that he wanted to retire because (although he can still shoot on film) he cannot project on 35mm prints in most American cinemas, because of the rapid conversion to digital. Paul Thomas Anderson recently was able to create the most prints in years for his film. There also are many film directors such as,,, and who are adamant supporters of digital cinema and the potential for higher frame rates that it brings.
- Mark Galer; Les Horvat (2005).. Elsevier. .
- ; David Litschel; Robert Davis (2005).. Elsevier. .
- Marvin J. Rosen; David L. Devries (2002).. Kendall Hunt. .
- Jurij F. Tasič; Mohamed Najim; Michael Ansorge (2003).. Springer. .
- Issac Amadror (2009). "3".. Springer London. .
- ^ Langford, Michael (2000). Basic Photography (7th Ed.). Oxford: Focal Press. .
- . 18 December 2014.
- R. N. Clark, 8 April 2001. Retrieved 2 September 2006.
- Norman Koren, 2000/2010, retrieved May 2010.
- research using a digital camera
- cigsandvines (10 August 2006). – via YouTube.
- . 30 November 2012.
Celebrity look alike old photos
Daytona bike week 2018 photos
Young wild and free photos
Manfrotto 393 heavy telephoto lens support
Edward weston photographer biography